The Global Financial Inclusion Index Key themes Spotlight on the United States

Spotlight on the United States

The strong performance of the United States in the Global Financial Inclusion Index can be attributed to its excellent scores in the financial system support and employer support pillars.

A mother works on her computer at the kitchen counter with her children.
5 min read |

Note: Below is a featured insight from the 2022 Global Financial Inclusion Index.

The strong performance of the United States in the Index, ranking second out of all 42 markets, can be attributed to its excellent scores in the financial system support and employer support pillars, at 76.7 and 81.3 for each pillar respectively. The U.S. ranks second for employer support while securing the top spot for financial inclusion support provided by the financial system.

For the financial system support pillar, the market’s performance is remarkable: The world’s largest economy attains scores of above 90 for five out of the seven indicators. In particular, the U.S. leads all markets in the enabler of SME growth and success indicator—which tracks business sentiment on whether a market’s financial system enables small and midsize businesses to thrive—showcasing the optimism surrounding the U.S. financial system.

Other indicators where the U.S. scored exceptionally well include the ease of access to credit, borrowers’ and lenders’ protection rights, access to bank accounts, and the quality of and developments in the fintech space. Nonetheless, the U.S. performs far below average in the use of real-time payments indicator, with a score of just 3.6, ranking 25th. Though the U.S. saw approximately 1.2 billion real-time transactions in 2020, it’s a market that remains almost completely untapped, and this is reflected in its low score when adjusting for population size.

The U.S. also is a leader in employer support, with scores of at least 70 in each of the pillar’s four indicators. A key driver for its overall second place ranking is its score in the employee pension contributions indicator (88.2), ranking first across all markets analyzed.

In particular, pension contributions by U.S. firms/organizations amounted to, on average, 9.6% of wages, based on results from the bespoke survey conducted, second only to China, where the corresponding figure stood at 11.6%. Moreover, a majority of U.S. firms’ (57.4%) pension/retirement contributions were above government-mandated levels, further fueling the market’s strong performance in the indicator.

Nonetheless, the U.S. misses out on the top spot in the Index due to its score in the government support pillar. Its score of 56.9 is the lowest among the markets in the top 10 of the Index. This is partly fueled by the market’s poor score in the complexity of corporate taxation systems indicator, where it scored 30.1 and ranked 32. Given the well-documented inefficiencies that affect the U.S. taxation system, its weak score is not surprising. Other indicators which fueled the low government support score include the state of public pensions and online connectivity indicators, where the U.S. registered scores of just 49.9 (17th) and 53.9 (eighth) respectively.

Deep dive on population perception of financial inclusion in the U.S.

Whilst the U.S. performs strongly in the Global Financial Inclusion Index (ranking second overall) and its population generally feels financially included (ranking 10th in the consumer survey), this Index explores at a deeper level the degree to which different demographics experience financial inclusion across the country.

To supplement the data relating to different demographic groups in the U.S., a further survey ascertains the extent to which people from different racial and socioeconomic backgrounds feel financially included.

As this data was gathered three months later (May 2022) than the data which forms the basis of the consumer financial inclusion global rankings—during which time financial markets and household finances were significantly impacted by rapidly rising inflation and the war in Ukraine—the data sets have not been combined. Instead, the demographic analysis is derived from a standalone data set. The numbers in this section, therefore, do not correspond to the number used in the overall Consumer Financial Inclusion ranking and are used solely to enable comparisons within the U.S. and establish broad racial, gender, and socioeconomic trends. This separate study surveys over 2,000 household financial decision makers in the U.S.

Below are some of the key findings from the U.S. survey:

Key finding No. 1

Women feel they have less access to financial products, tools, services, and safeguards than men. 

For the vast majority of indicators analyzed,  women feel they have significantly less access than men. There are two exceptions—access to bank accounts and access to online banking—and, even then, the margin is mere percentage points.

The most notable gaps include:

  • Confident they could get a mortgage:
    • 44% of women
    • 60% of men
  • Feel they have sufficient access to financial education:
    • 48% of women
    • 60% of men
  • Say they have sufficient access to affordable loans/debt products:
    • 46% of women
    • 64% of men
  • Feel they’d be able to quickly withdraw money from retirement savings for emergencies:
    • 50% of women
    • 63% of men
  • Feel they have sufficient access to affordable professional financial advice and planning:
    • 49% of women
    • 63% of men
  • Are confident in their ability to get a job:
    • 59% of women
    • 69% of men
  • Think there’s opportunity to earn a fair wage:
    • 50% of women
    • 62% of men
  • Feel they are adequately protected against fraud and financial abuse:
    • 47% of women
    • 60% of men

The following table provides the percentages of those who responded positively to the questions:

  • How sufficient, if at all, is the access you have to the following financial products, tools, and services?
  • To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements “In my market there is/are…”
  • How easy would you say is it to set up the following in your market?

Women feel they have less access to financial products, tools, services and safeguards than men.
  Men Women
Understanding and paying my taxes 68% 66%
The ability to quickly withdraw money from my retirement savings for emergencies 63% 50%
The ability to easily make domestic payments and transactions 73% 69%
Staying on top of my savings 68% 59%
Stability in the cost of living 50% 30%
Setting up Tax-incentivised Retirement Accounts 51% 37%
Safeguards to ensure my financial data is protected and private 61% 52%
Protection against fraud and financial abuse 60% 47%
Managing  income & expenditure 69% 64%
Affordable education 54% 41%
Access to online banking 78% 81%
Access to government-run guaranteed income programs for retirement 59% 41%
Access to easy to use online financial services 69% 64%
Access to affordable professional financial advice and planning 63% 49%
Access to affordable and comprehensive insurance protection 68% 61%
Ability to get a mortgage 60% 44%
 Setting up Tax-Incentivised Investment Accounts 50% 35%
A fair tax system 50% 31%
Access to a bank account 79% 81%
Access to affordable debt products 64% 46%
Access to budgeting advice 65% 54%
Access to financial education 60% 48%
Access to investment products 66% 49%
Access to retirement planning 61% 49%
Managing  household bills 73% 71%
Managing debt 66% 58%
Regulatory protection against uncompetitive business practices 56% 39%
Setting up insurance products 56% 53%
Setting up Tax-incentivised Savings Accounts 52% 36%
Staying on top of my retirement plan/pension 61% 49%
The ability to earn a fair wage 62% 50%
The ability to get a job 69% 59%
The ability to securely make e-commerce transactions 64% 46%

Key finding No. 2

Black and Hispanic communities in the U.S. find it harder than white communities to access financial products, tools, services and advice.

  • Find managing their income and expenditure achievable:
    • 59% of Hispanic respondents
    • 60% of Black respondents
    • 70% of white respondents
  • Say it’s sufficiently easy to get access to a bank account:
    • 69% of Hispanic respondents
    • 74% of Black respondents
    • 85% of white respondents
  • Say they have good access to digital services (online banking):
    • 69% of Hispanic respondents
    • 72% of Black respondents
    • 83% of white respondents
  • Think getting a job is achievable:
    • 63% of Hispanic respondents
    • 61% of Black respondents
    • 65% of white respondents
  • Find it easy to understand and pay their taxes:
    • 61% of Hispanic respondents
    • 62% of Black respondents
    • 69% of white respondents

The following table provides the percentages of those who responded positively to the questions:

  • How sufficient, if at all, is the access you have to the following financial products, tools, and services?
  • To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements “In my market there is/are…”

Black and Hispanic communities in the US find it harder than white communities to access financial products, tools, services and advice.
  White Black or African American Hispanic
Setting up Tax-Incentivised Investment Accounts 42% 43% 47%
Setting up Tax-incentivised Savings Accounts 45% 45% 43%
The ability to earn a fair wage 56% 57% 55%
Protection against fraud and financial abuse 54% 57% 54%
Safeguards to ensure my financial data is protected and private 57% 60% 55%
Access to budgeting advice 60% 63% 57%
Access to easy to use online financial services 70% 60% 59%
Managing debt 63% 63% 57%
The ability to quickly withdraw money from retirement savings for emergencies 55% 58% 61%
The ability to easily make domestic payments and transactions 55% 58% 51%
Ability to get a mortgage 53% 51% 52%
Staying on top of my retirement plan/pension 57% 55% 54%
Access to affordable and comprehensive insurance protection 67% 66% 58%
Access to a bank account 85% 74% 69%
Access to online banking 85% 74% 69%
Access to retirement planning 56% 56% 51%
Access to affordable debt products 55% 54% 53%
Access to investment products 59% 56% 56%
Staying on top of my savings 64% 64% 63%
Managing  income & expenditure 70% 60% 59%
Managing  household bills 75% 65% 66%
Access to affordable professional financial advice 56% 61% 55%
Understanding and paying my taxes 69% 62% 61%
The ability to securely make e-commerce transactions 56% 56% 55%
The ability to get a job 65% 61% 63%
Access to government-run guaranteed income programmes for retirement 50% 49% 56%
Setting up Tax-incentivised Retirement Accounts 45% 44% 45%
Setting up insurance products 59% 54% 43%

Key finding No. 3

People in full-time employment feel they have better access to financial support than those who work part-time.

  • Feel they have sufficient access to the products and services provided by the government, the financial system, and their employer:
    • 65% of full-time workers
    • 53% of part-time workers
    • 41% of unemployed respondents
  • Feel they have sufficient access to affordable debt products:
    • 66% of full-time workers
    • 35% of unemployed respondents
  • Feel they have good access to financial education: 
    • 44% of unemployed respondents
    • 63% of full-time workers
    • 55% of part-time workers
  • Say they have sufficient access to retirement planning services:
    • 68% of full-time workers
    • 46% of part-time workers 
  • Say they have sufficient access to tax incentivized savings and investment accounts:
    • 50% of full-time workers
    • 39% of part-time workers  
  • Feel they can easily get a mortgage:
    • 66% of full-time workers
    • 46% of part-time workers 

Those who work part time, and who are therefore more likely to be part of an informal or freelance economy, report substandard access to retirement, savings and investment products. The statistics regarding those who are unemployed are substantially lower.

  • Say they have sufficient access to retirement planning services:
    • 68% of full-time workers
    • 46% of part-time workers
  • Say they have sufficient access to tax incentivized savings and investment accounts:
    • 50% of full-time workers
    • 39% of part-time workers  
  • Feel they can easily get a mortgage:
    • 66% of full-time workers
    • 46% of part-time workers

Those who work part time, and who are therefore more likely to be part of an informal or freelance economy, report substandard access to retirement, savings and investment products. The statistics regarding those who are unemployed are substantially lower.

The following table provides the percentages of those who responded positively to the question:

  • How sufficient, if at all, is the access you have to the following financial products, tools, and services?
  • To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements “In my market there is/are...” 
  • How easy would you say is it to set up the following in your market?

People in full time employment feel they have better access to financial support than those who work part time.
  Work full time work part time Unemployed
The ability to earn a fair wage 63% 53% 45%
The ability to get a job 73% 62% 50%
Access to financial education 63% 55% 44%
Access to affordable and comprehensive insurance protection 71% 60% 43%
Access to online banking 82% 73% 63%
Access to a bank account 84% 75% 61%
Access to affordable debt products 66% 48% 35%
Ability to get a mortgage 66% 46% 30%
Setting up Tax-Incentivised Investment Accounts 53% 39% 27%
Setting up Tax-incentivised Retirement Accounts 54% 36% 28%
Setting up Tax-incentivised Savings Accounts 54% 39% 31%

To read more Index insights or the full report, see Data and Resources.

Connect with us

Want to stay up to date on our research insights? Follow us on LinkedIn. Have a question for our media team? Contact media relations.