The Global Financial Inclusion Index Methodology

Methodology

How do we measure financial inclusion?

The Global Financial Inclusion Index (Index) methodology, developed by the Centre for Economics and Business Research (Cebr), combines various data sources into one unified measure of financial inclusion at the market level. Structurally, the Index is split into three pillars—government, financial system, and employer support—which in turn consist of a varying number of indicators.

An indicator can consist of single or multiple variables derived from a combination of publicly available data sources and survey-based research. The data points are combined to provide an indicator score, subsequent pillar score, and headline Index ranking by market.

Learn more about the methodology.

Government support
Evaluates the degree to which governments promote financial inclusion

Financial system support
Examines the availability and uptake of various types of financial products and services that are central to financial inclusion

Employer support
Assesses the level of support employers provide their employees

FAQ

About the Index

What is the Global Financial Inclusion Index?

The Index was created by Principal and the Centre for Economics and Business Research (Cebr) to measure the degree to which people in regions around the world have access to useful and affordable financial products and services that meet their needs.

Using publicly available data combined with global consumer and business owner surveying, the Index evaluates the degree to which governments, employers, and financial systems promote financial inclusion in 42 markets.

Why did Principal conduct this research?

As a leader in global financial services, Principal is committed to helping more individuals, businesses, and communities become more financially secure. When we launched our first Global Financial Inclusion Index in 2022, our aim was to gain greater insight into the levers that enable and inhibit financial inclusion in different markets around the world. The drive to explore this theme is rooted in our belief that financial inclusion sits at the heart of financial security and global economic progress.

While we’ve made great strides in improving financial security for more people, recent events—the ongoing impact of the pandemic, war in Ukraine, commodity scarcity, rising inflation—have also revealed fragile economic footing for the financially insecure, resulting in increased poverty rates and a widening wealth and income gap.

To progress toward greater financial security, it’s important to first measure and understand financial inclusion. It’s why we’ve partnered with Cebr to develop the Global Financial Inclusion Index to measure the degree to which people have access to useful and affordable financial products and services. By using data-driven insights like those found in the Index, we can help identify the structural gaps and clear opportunities to improve financial inclusion globally—ultimately building a more productive and protected workforce and society.

How will Principal use the results?

The insights gained from the Global Financial Inclusion Index will help inform how Principal considers future products, services, and investments, our philanthropic efforts, and the organizations and companies we collaborate with to advance financial security.

Long term, the Index will enable Principal and others to take a more nuanced and informed approach to the ongoing dialogue around financial inclusion as a core component of financial security. Use of data-driven insights will provide clearer understanding of the barriers to financial security and allow all of us to produce alternative pathways that broaden access to financial solutions and support.

How does the Index define financial inclusion?

The definition of financial inclusion used in the report and the accompanying content is based on the World Bank, which states that financial inclusion entails “individuals and businesses having access to useful and affordable financial products and services that meet their needs—transactions, payments, savings, credit, and insurance—delivered in a responsible and sustainable way.”

While this is a helpful starting point, the broad-based and complex nature of financial inclusivity implies that there is no single, catch-all metric that can be employed to observe the state of financial inclusion globally. As such, the Index looks at financial inclusion around three clearly defined pillars: the support provided to people by the government, the financial system, and employers.

How does the Index differ from other indices?

The Global Financial Inclusion Index draws upon a wide range of data, providing insights into the extent to which governments promote financial inclusion, the availability and uptake of financial products and services, and the level of support employers provide to their employees across 42 markets.

A multitude of factors contribute to an individual’s access to—and understanding of—tools that improve their financial well-being. Historic studies have placed a focus on factors such as access to bank accounts and credit which, though crucial, are not forward-looking metrics. Our Index goes one step further and analyzes markets based on factors that will impact the future productivity and resilience of their economies, such as the prevalence of fintechs, metrics of business confidence, and the availability and use of benefits and investment services. The Global Financial Inclusion Index also goes into more granular detail on the specifics of different corporate sectors.

We have partnered with Cebr to develop a robust measurement framework which uses a unique benchmark based on a proprietary scoring system underpinned by independently-verified, publicly-available data sets and custom survey data. By combining public data with polling of general populations and businesses, the report gives a holistic perspective on financial inclusion.

About the methodology

Who did Principal partner with to develop the Index?

It’s imperative to work with a credible and respected third party on this research to provide an unbiased view of the challenges facing financial inclusion globally.

Principal has partnered with the Centre for Economics and Business Research (Cebr), a leading economics consultancy that’s research spans the globe. A renowned commentator on business and consumer developments and an expert in producing economic impact studies, Cebr is a leader in developing innovative methodologies to quantify the economic contribution of new technologies and other aspects of the economy. It’s the ideal partner to work with to develop the Global Financial Inclusion Index.

What methodology was used to compile the Index?

The Global Financial Inclusion Index methodology, developed by Cebr, combines various data sources into one unified measure of financial inclusion at the individual market level. Structurally, the Index is split into three pillars—government, financial system, and employer support—which in turn consist of a varying number of indicators. 

An indicator can consist of a single or multiple variables derived from a combination of publicly available quantitative data sources and survey-based data. To arrive at the indicator score, subsequent pillar score, and headline index ranking, we combine the various data points.

Scores for each market are generated based on its performance as measured by a particular indicator. Each indicator follows the same set of steps, allowing assignment of a value between 0 and 100 to each market, resulting in relative values.

As in the 2022 report, we have placed a relative greater weighting on the government support and financial system support pillars, as they are derived from a broader range of data sources (including the proprietary business survey conducted for the purposes of building this Index as well as authoritative third-party data sources), while the employer support pillar exclusively relies on the business survey results, ascertaining what support and benefits employers provide as a business.

While the survey data is an important part of the data inputs required for the Index, it’s important to acknowledge that the information based on robust secondary data sources should be attributed a greater weight, as it’s more likely to reflect an objective assessment of the respective measures. Therefore, we have assigned a lower weight to survey-based indicators within pillars.

This approach provides a unique market score for each metric, which allows us to present separate figures for each indicator and pillar as well as an overall market score.

How was the absolute scoring developed?

Whereas the Index rankings evaluate a market's level of financial inclusion in relation to other markets in the Index, this year’s research incorporates a new and important metric: regional and global scores on an absolute basis.

As the global and regional scores do not employ rankings, year-over-year comparisons need to be made with absolute scores. To ensure accurate and meaningful comparisons, we conducted a separate modeling exercise to ensure the absolute scores of the 2022 and 2023 iterations of the indices are directly comparable.

The market-specific scores derived as part of this exercise were consolidated into regional scores using population weights, representing distinct geographical areas—namely the Americas, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East, and Africa.

Subsequently, a global score was derived by applying population weights to these regional scores.

This exercise was conducted independently from the composition of the main Index. It ensures consistent comparison across absolute scores for all indicators (and subsequently, for all three pillars, and the overall scores), with scores interpreted on a 0 to 100 scale.

Scores and rankings are only representative of the state of financial inclusion across all 42 markets in the Index, and not across all economies in the world.

How does the index track year-over-year comparisons?

The methodology is designed to permit year-over-year comparisons, enabling us to track the changes in financial inclusivity across various markets over time.

To achieve this, we've adapted the methodology to facilitate year-over-year comparisons while preserving the integrity of the 2022 Index results. ​

The indicators constituting the 2022 Index have been retained in their entirety for the 2023 iteration. ​

However, certain adjustments have been made to the source data of a select few indicators, mainly to mitigate a lack of new data or to account for revised data for specific indicators, alongside further methodological refinements.​

We have marginally modified data for indicators that relied on revised historical data: ​

  1. Deposit protection schemes​
  2. Education levels
  3. Financial literacy​
  4. Access to credit​

The change in these data sources occasionally leads to significant variations in year-on-year index scores, although the rankings experience minimal alteration. ​

To prevent any potential confusion, Cebr advises that this report will prioritize rank comparisons (over scores) across all levels, namely indicators, pillars, and the overall index. ​

Given that in the 2022 index target audiences found the rankings to be more meaningful than the scores, we view the impact of these methodological changes as minimal. ​

Which pillars and indicators constitute financial inclusion?

The Index is built around three clearly defined pillars.

The government support pillar evaluates the degree to which governments promote financial inclusion. It examines:

  • the state of public pensions and retirement offerings

  • the existence and coverage of deposit protection schemes

  • the scope of consumer championing regulations

  • employment levels (adjusted to account for informal employment)

  • the awareness and use of government-mandated pension schemes

  • education levels

  • the complexity of corporate taxation systems (used as a proxy for the complexity of income taxation systems due to lack of reliable data for the former)

  • the availability and scope of government-provided financial education

  • relative levels of financial literacy across societies

  • the levels of online connectivity in each market

The financial system support pillar examines the availability and uptake of various types of financial products and services that are central to financial inclusion. It scores markets on:

  • volume of real-time payments (weighted by population)

  • relative levels of access to credit

  • borrowers’ and lenders’ protection rights

  • access to bank accounts

  • access to capital

  • developments made in the financial technology space

  • how well the financial system in each market enables small and medium enterprises to thrive

  • the overall effectiveness of the financial system in influencing businesses' willingness to participate and engage in financial activities, which in turn fosters a more inclusive and accessible financial environment

The employer support pillar examines the efficacy of business support for employee financial well-being and inclusion across various dimensions such as:

  • Provision of guidance and support around financial issues by employers

  • employee pension contributions

  • employee insurance programs

  • employer pay initiatives (delivery, flexibility) to promote financial inclusion 

Which indicators are based on the business survey?

A significant portion of the scores is derived from publicly available data, with most indicators based on multiple sources and quantitative data. Where publicly available data does not exist, data has been gathered from comprehensive surveys of senior business managers. 

The employer support pillar and a small number of indicators within the government and financial system support pillars are based on business survey data. They are:

Government support

  • Consumer championing regulation

  • Awareness and uptake of government-mandated pensions/savings

  • Availability of government-provided financial education

Financial system support

  • Enabler of small and medium enterprise (SME) growth and success

  • Enabler of general business confidence

Employer support

  • Provision of guidance and support around financial issues

  • Employee pension contributions

  • Employer insurance schemes

  • Employer pay initiatives

What are the gobal and regional scores?

Whereas the Index rankings evaluate a market's level of financial inclusion in relation to other markets in the Index, the regional and global scores on an absolute basis, with scores interpreted on a 0 to 100 scale.

The market-specific scores derived as part of this exercise were consolidated into regional scores using population weights, representing distinct geographical areas—namely the Americas, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East, and Africa. Subsequently, a global score was derived by applying population weights to these regional scores.

Scores and rankings are only representative of the state of financial inclusion across all 42 markets in the Index, and not across all economies in the world.

How does the Index assess population sentiment around perceptions of financial inclusion?

To provide a complete and holistic picture of global financial inclusion, it’s important also to consider the view of individuals across the 42 markets and analyze the extent to which populations recognize and understand how governments, financial systems, and their employers support their financial well-being.

The Index is supplemented with a comprehensive consumer survey of 500 people from each of the 42 markets to assess how residents rate the access they have to financial support, products, tools, and services, and to analyze to what extent populations’ understanding of these initiatives reflect the programs, provisions, and performance of these institutions.

The consumer sentiment survey is a separate, complementary study and is not part of the Index methodology.

What are the details of the survey base?

What is the sample size for the B2B (business-to-business) survey?

  • The employer support pillar is informed by an employer survey conducted by Opinium, which surveyed senior managers working in companies of two or more employees. The survey was conducted from May 19 to June 9, 2023 among 8,700 business respondents in total with a minimum of 50 respondents in each market, which is considered indicative.

    Sample sizes: 1000 in the U.S. and 250 in most markets except where not possible: Chile (50), Peru (150), Switzerland (150), Norway (50), Denmark (100), Finland (150), Hong Kong (150), Indonesia (100), Malaysia (100), Taiwan (100), Thailand (200), United Arab Emirates (150), Israel (200), and Ghana (50)

What is the same size for the B2C (business-to-consumer) survey?

  • 21,500 people, including 500 household financial decision makers per market which is considered indicative. No weightings applied. The U.S. is the exception where we target 1,000 household financial decision makers in the (with even split of 250 respondents across Baby Boomers, Gen Xers, Millennials, Gen Zers).

All surveys were conducted online.

A busy street produce market in Hong Kong, China

Global insights

Explore the latest insights from Principal experts on the Global Financial Inclusion Index, as well as attitudes, behaviors, and trends that impact access to long-term financial security.  

Discover more financial inclusion insights.

Connect with us

Want to stay up to date on our insights?

Have a question for our media team? Contact media relations.